[Workshop Report] Tsutaeru Lounge workshop – Session 2 (Reported by: Aoi Ishikawa, D1, School of Life Science and Technology, ToTAL 7th cohort)

We began with self-introductions and an icebreaker. For the icebreaker, we conducted “GOOD & NEW,” where participants share something positive or novel from the past 24 hours. Most participants were same as the previous session, allowing the workshop to proceed in a consistently relaxed and open atmosphere.

We conducted a review of the previous session followed by a lecture on this session’s core theme.

• Review of Previous Session: We revisited argument construction using the AREA framework, “NLC (Numbering, Labeling, Contents)” for clearly outlining the structure and main points, and “True × Important” for examining credibility and significance. Additionally, we adopted an output-oriented format by presenting flawed examples and asking participants why they were problematic via a quiz. They quickly raised accurate observations, demonstrating solid retention of the previous material.
  
• This Session’s Lecture (Toulmin Model): We delivered a lecture on the Toulmin Model. Since beginners often confuse “Warrant” with “Backing,” we highlighted their critical differences specifically, whether the element directly connects data to the claim. As a result, participants achieved high accuracy on the subsequent practice problems.

We conducted “Debate Jenga,” an exercise applying the newly learned Toulmin Model along with AREA and NLC. We allocated more time than last session to allow participants to search for data and supporting references. Due to the number of participants, TAs evaluated and judged the affirmative and negative teams. Both teams structured their arguments around NLC and AREA, making their line of reasoning remarkably clear. Furthermore, they introduced perspectives, reasons, and evidence that went beyond our initial expectations when designing the prompt. For instance, on the topic “Should paper textbooks be completely eliminated in elementary and junior high schools in favor of a full transition to digital tablets?”, in addition to anticipated points on learning efficiency and financial costs, participants highlighted the physical health impact caused by heavy school bags.